Category: Guest Blog

  • Creative Encounters: Art in the Archives Conference Review

    Creative Encounters: Art in the Archives Conference Review

    by Jessye Persse, Library, Information and Archive Assistant, Stockport Council

    Photographs by BRA Secretary Amanda Engineer

    As an artist and graduate of an Illustration degree – who is also currently undertaking an apprenticeship in Library, Information and Archive Services at Stockport Local Heritage Library – I was immediately drawn to the Creative Encounters conference as it combined both of my worlds. I was fortunate enough to attend after submitting a written application for a free place from the British Records Association, organisers of the conference.

    A woman stood at a lectern with a laptop on it, giving a presentation. A projection screen is to her left
    Leah Benson, Archivist, National Gallery of Ireland giving a presentation on the Denis Mahon Archives.

    The first speaker of the day was Leah Benson, Archivist for the National Gallery of Ireland. She discussed the Denis Mahon Archives; an enormous collection created by the art collector and historian, taking up almost an entire townhouse in London. It was boxed up and brought to Ireland by the archivists themselves after Denis donated it, and includes artworks (mostly Italian Baroque art), books, letters and extensive research into the artworks and their history. The amount of work and care that has gone into collecting, cataloguing and preserving this archive is a testament to both the staff of the National Gallery of Ireland, and to Denis Mahon for his valuable contribution to the art world.

    Chloe Julius Library Fellow from the Paul Mellon Centre giving a presentation on Brian Sewell’s archives. The slides show covers of his books.

    Next were Archivist and Records Manager Charlotte Brunskill and Archives and Library Fellow Chloe Julius of the Paul Mellon Centre, who spoke about the archive of art historian and critic Brian Sewell. Throughout his career, Sewell was involved in many controversies and was known for giving cutting reviews in his Evening Standard newspaper column. When asked by an attendee if this posed a challenge in having his archive open to the public, Charlotte explained that it didn’t, as Sewell’s opinions were already available to the public through his column and books. I found this discussion around censorship and the closure of records to be really important, particularly when working with the archives involving contemporary people.

     

    A woman stood at a lectern with a laptop on it, giving a presentation. A projection screen is to her left showing a photograph of a bundle of documents
    Wellcome Collection Archivist Elena Carter showing bundles of documents in Audrey Amiss’ archive

    The last morning session was by Collections Development Archivist Elena Carter and Conservator Stefania Signorello of the Wellcome Collection. They shared the deeply emotive archive of artist Audrey Amiss; a significant and varied collection of artworks, sketchbooks, photo albums, logbooks and more. This posed unique challenges for the team. For example, many of Audrey’s scrapbooks contained food or food packaging which required a creative conservation solution from Stefania accounting for any pest control challenges. It was very moving to see that Audrey’s original order and dating had been preserved in the cataloguing done by Elena. It was hard not to feel the level of care and responsibility that Elena and Stefania felt for both Audrey and her collection, which led me to think about the idea of getting to know someone that you have never met through their archives. Throughout this talk, there were also discussions around mental health, as this is a strong theme throughout Audrey’s artwork and life, and the speakers were very sensitive in ensuring that they were always using Audrey’s own words when highlighting this.

    A woman stood at a lectern with a laptop on it, giving a presentation. A projection screen is to her left showing a yogurt carton conserved by her, pasted in a scrapbook
    Stefania Signorello, Conservator at the Wellcome Collection showing a page from a scrapbook with a yogurt lid and sweets that she has conserved

    After the lunch break, Mark Pomeroy, Archivist at the Royal Academy of Arts, gave us an insight into the life of artist Sir Thomas Lawrence, a self-taught child prodigy who became president of the Royal Academy in the early 19th century. This speaker gave more of a biographical discussion of Lawrence’s life and how this is told through his archives. He touched on the importance of the collection in telling the story of Lawrence’s life, and how there are missing records from the years before Lawrence moved to his final address, leading to gaps in their knowledge of him. He also emphasised the recurring theme of how you can get to know someone you have never met through studying their archives.

    Dr Giorgia Bottinelli, Curator of Historic Art at Norwich Castle Museum & Art Gallery spoke about John Crome, an artist of the same era as Sir Thomas Lawrence but of a very different character. Crome was a teacher and landscape painter who lived in Norwich and exhibited artworks in London. This talk was mostly a biographical discussion about Crome. However, there was a particularly interesting anecdote about the ingenious way that she was able to date an artwork of Crome’s. This was done by researching elements of the painting, such as the unusual colours of leaves on a tree, which was only present after particularly hot summers. By looking at records of temperatures in the timespan that it could have been painted, the date could be narrowed down to one year. Stories like this highlight the importance of preserving records for future generations to learn from.

    A woman stood at a lectern with a laptop on it, giving a presentation. A projection screen is to her left and she is pointing to a manuscript shown on it
    Giorgia Bottinelli Curator of Historic Art at Norwich Castle Museum & Art Gallery showing a manuscript of John Crome’s.

    Next was Freelance Archive Consultant Victoria Lane who spoke of her experiences working with contemporary artists on their archives. She outlined the challenges of this, as artists often see only their actual artwork as the archive and not the records, journals and letters they produce. Yet these records tell the story of an artwork’s creation and the artist’s life. Artists may want their archives to be arranged in a way that goes against archival best practice too. However, Victoria stated the benefits of working with creators is that they can provide context to why particular items have been kept or arranged in unusual ways. I found Victoria’s knowledge and expertise in this area to be very helpful for my own role, where it can often be challenging to decipher the original orders of archival donations.

    After a tea break, there were three shorter presentations, posing the question ‘If it exists at all, where does the boundary between art and document lie?’ The first was by was by Artist and Researcher Michael Takeo Magruder, who shared his artwork which was created using archives, and shows how they can interact with digital technology. The second presentation was by Archivist and Researcher Sarah Haylett, who discussed the overlap between art and archives, with a particular focus on oral histories. Sir Charles Saumarez Smith, Chairman of the Royal Drawing School presented last and discussed the idea of keeping the different elements of an archive together as opposed to separating them.

    A panel of three individuals sat in chairs in a row. The centre man is gesticulating as he talks
    Sir Charles Saumarez, Michael Takeo Magruder and Sarah Haylett answering questions on the final panel

    I would strongly encourage those working or interested in the archive or records management fields to attend future conferences hosted by the BRA, as this conference was of a high professional standard, with speakers from esteemed institutions and organisations that have inspired my way of thinking within my own practice.

     

  • ‘Why Archives Matter’ a review

    A guest blog by Dr. Alice Prochaska, co-chair of the ‘Why Archives Matter’ webinar and member of the BRA’s Archives Advocacy Group

    The Shock of the Record:Archives and Truth webinar series addresses the world-wide crisis of misinformation in what we might term an era of post truth.  A recent article in the New York Times refers to the babble of orchestrated mendacity. Cynicism about public sources of information is rife.  We need to know what we can trust, how to evaluate the information that is produced in a proliferating range of forms, from traditional print to broadcast and social media and the exponentially proliferating born-digital archives that are served up, often without any kind of mediation, by an infinite number of organisations and individuals.  In all this, the importance of records and their evidential value is frequently not recognised. In the first seminar, Why Archives Matter, three distinguished panellists reflected on their own experiences and affirmed the importance of archival evidence. 

    Professor Sir Richard Evans, a leading expert on the Third Reich and former Regius Professor of History at Cambridge, considered why conspiracy theorists still insist in believing that Hitler survived in 1945, despite the overwhelming evidence that in fact he died in his Berlin bunker.  Conspiracy theorists have a deep-seated belief in their own rightness, even sometimes going to the extent of inventing evidence because they are sure it supports a correct view.   Thinking of the fundamental importance of archival evidence, and concerned about evidence destroyed (e.g. by the British government covering up atrocities that preceded decolonisation in Kenya), Evans would like ideally to see all archival material preserved.  His appreciation of the importance of all records was heightened by watching the many family and local historians who used the archives he was consulting in Germany.  Universal preservation is a controversial subject and one of the many electronic issues currently under discussion by archivists and record keepers globally. 

    David Ferriero, Archivist of the United States, saw Thomas Jefferson as the forerunner of the era of digitisation when he called for preserving the multiplicity of government records.   He described the problems facing the US National Archives (founded by President Franklin Roosevelt in 1935) in attempting to preserve essential material within a legislative framework that provides for preservation of the records of the federal government but not those of Congress or the judiciary.  Record Keeping isn’t sexy he observed, and it is difficult for non-historians to understand that there will always be different versions of history, and new questions to be asked.  Eternal vigilance is called for to ensure that records survive, and he confirmed in discussion that NARA has kept President Trump’s tweets.  In discussion, he highlighted what the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in the US does to promote public interest in the archives.  Their projects range from inviting every new member of Congress to visit the archives, and supplying facsimiles of records about their states to embellish their offices, to working closely with schools. 

    Lord Daniel Finkelstein, Times columnist, government adviser and peer, focused on his grandfather Alfred Wiener, whose life’s work was guided by his belief in the power of truth.  Wiener had collected anti-semitic writings in Weimar Germany and tried in vain to persuade others to take seriously the threat that they represented.  In 1933 he moved to Holland, created a new collection and then moved to Britain with his collection in 1938.  The Wiener Library opened just as the second world war broke out.  It played an important part in informing the US and British governments about Nazi ideologues, and supplied evidence for the Nuremberg trials after the war.  One result of writing his grandfather’s biography is for Finkelstein also his deepened understanding of how important archives are for people discovering their own family histories.  

     A rich set of comments and discussion has continued on Twitter and elsewhere.  The 300th anniversary of the office of the UK Prime Minister seems like a good time to pay attention to the records of officers of state. Daniel Finkelstein, who has kept a record of regular conversations with prime minister David Cameron, bemoaned the carelessness there has been in keeping prime ministers’ records.  As one commentator observed, Walpole the first prime minister himself doctored the record of his own and his government’s dealings in the South Sea Bubble, to the extent of inserting new false accounts into the state papers.  One might add that even despite the rules laid down in the UK’s Public Records Acts, modern government ministers’ papers are not immune to selective disappearanceMeanwhile, public inquiries into the handling of the Covid19 pandemic will rely crucially on archives. 

     A strong thread in the discussion concerned conspiracy theories.  Richard Evans described how they can be ‘self-sealing, with those who hold such theories becoming sealed off from believing any contrary evidence, however compelling.  Conspiracy theorists target the people putting forward a more truthful version of events, rather than considering the evidence.   It is important for archivists to remain neutral in the way they preserve and present the sources.  But how can the purveyors of conspiracy theories, and still more the members of the general public who buy into them, be persuaded to open their minds to admit contrary evidence?  We need to find ways to draw in the sceptical towards trustworthy archives. 

    Commentators pleaded in various ways, that archives must be properly funded, and that we need a public campaign to raise awareness of their importance.  David Ferriero’s description of the ways that NARA opens up the archives to the public and invites the public in was suggestive.  Friday fun days in the archives and school sleepovers among the foundational records of the state are among his innovations, and it is important to work with schools’ own curricula, rather than simply providing pre-selected packages of material.  Others spoke of the experience of showing original documents to school classes, and the inspiration of seeing and touching archives.  Daniel Finkelstein and Richard Evans both observed that personal genealogical research is powerful, and it is important that access to archives should be universal, not limited in any way to a research elite.   All of us who are interested in public civic education should mind about this.  This could be a topic on its own for a webinar series, as generations of archivists know from struggling to provide, with inadequate resources, the research services needed by schools and the general public alongside the professional support that academic researchers need. 

     A major theme underlying much of the commentary was the advance in technological means of producing, preserving and accessing archives.  As David Ferriero remarked, the digitisation of records originally produced on paper and parchment was but one stage in the continuing information revolution.  Most archivally important information is generated now on the Cloud and in other born digital formats.  The role of the archivist has been transformed more than once during our lifetimes, and the capture and preservation of information in multiple digital formats, on multiple platforms, presents one of the greatest challenges.   That role includes new ways of constructing the metadata or navigational tools for finding information, to build trust in reliable archives alongside scepticism of untested sources, and to identify the human agency involved in the creation of the archive, in whatever format it may appear. 

    Our first seminar in the series has provoked widespread interest and some illuminating discussion, thanks especially to our three inspiring speakers.  To keep the conversation going, two more seminars have been arranged by the BRA, both in partnership with the Institute of Historical Research: Evidence Under Attack on 17 June and Truth and Trust on 11 November. Bookings are open for the June webinar. Everyone with an interest in the importance of archives and the role of archivists in the ever more challenging role of preserving records in all formats and making them available for all, is invited to contribute to the discussion.  You might also consider joining the BRA which is actively leading the debate on this crucial topic. The more publicity we can generate the better.